HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Raghuram @ Reghoram – Appellant
Versus
State Of M.P. – Respondent
(Delivered on 31st day of July, 2021)
Per, Shailendra Shukla, J :-
This appeal under Section 374 Cr.P.C. has been preferred
against the judgment dated 3.3.2009 passed by the Addl. Sessions
Judge, Badwah, West Nimar (M.P.) in S.T. No.144/2008, whereby the
appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced
to Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.200/-. In lieu of payment of fine
amount, the appellant has been directed to undergo one month’s
additional imprisonment.
2.
Admitted facts are that deceased Subhadra Bai is the wife of
appellant Raghuram and witnesses Kavita and Roshani are the
children of appellant and the deceased.
2
3.
The prosecution story in short is that on 4.6.2008 at about 10.20
P.M. Subhadra Bai, wife of the appellant, was brought to Government
Hospital at Sanawad in burnt condition. She was found to have
suffered 100% burns, there was smell of kerosene coming from her
body and clothes. The doctor on duty recorded her dying declaration, in
which she levelled allegations against the appellant i.e. her husband as
the one who had poured kerosene over her and burnt her. She was
referred to M.Y. Hospital, Indore, where
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.