SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Raghuram @ Reghoram – Appellant
Versus
State Of M.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ls.Chandirmani,Ss.Pawar/,Ag.

(Delivered on 31st day of July, 2021)

Per, Shailendra Shukla, J :-

This appeal under Section 374 Cr.P.C. has been preferred

against the judgment dated 3.3.2009 passed by the Addl. Sessions

Judge, Badwah, West Nimar (M.P.) in S.T. No.144/2008, whereby the

appellant has been convicted under Section 302 of IPC and sentenced

to Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs.200/-. In lieu of payment of fine

amount, the appellant has been directed to undergo one month’s

additional imprisonment.

2.

Admitted facts are that deceased Subhadra Bai is the wife of

appellant Raghuram and witnesses Kavita and Roshani are the

children of appellant and the deceased.

2

3.

The prosecution story in short is that on 4.6.2008 at about 10.20

P.M. Subhadra Bai, wife of the appellant, was brought to Government

Hospital at Sanawad in burnt condition. She was found to have

suffered 100% burns, there was smell of kerosene coming from her

body and clothes. The doctor on duty recorded her dying declaration, in

which she levelled allegations against the appellant i.e. her husband as

the one who had poured kerosene over her and burnt her. She was

referred to M.Y. Hospital, Indore, where

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top