IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR PALIWAL
ON THE 8th OF APRIL, 2022
CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1202 of 1998
Between:-
LOKMAN , AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, (MADHYA
PRADESH)
.....APPELLANT
(BY SHRI ASADULLA USMANI - ADVOCATE)
AND
THE STATE OF M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI YOGENDRA DAS YADAV, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE )
This appeal coming on for final hearing this day, the court delivered the
following:
Advocate General,
This criminal appeal under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure has been filed by the appellant Lokman against the judgment of
conviction and order of sentence dated 19.05.1998 passed by VIIth Additional
Sessions Judge, Jabalpur in Sessions Trial No. 604/95 whereby appellant Lokman
has been convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 307 of
IPC and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5
years.
2. The prosecution story in short is that on 28.04.1995 at about 09:35 a.m.
Santosh Yadav (PW-4) resident of village Gram Sundarpur P.S.Panagar lodged
FIR stating that he is a milkman and sells milk. Today he by his bicycle had come
to sell milk in Chandan Colony Manegoan. After giving milk in Chandan Colony
with a view to purchase Khalli Chunni from Munna Khalli Chunni's shop he came
to Sai Pradhan. After parking his bicycle in front of the shop of Munna, he was
standing there. At around 09:05 a.m. someone from back side put a hand on his
left shoulder. At this, when he looked back, he found that middle son-in-law of his
uncle (phoopha) Phoolchand, gave a knife blow on the right side of his back and
1
Digitally signed by BIJU BABY
Date: 2022.04.12 18:53:24 IST
SAN
Signature Not Verified
fled away after thrusting knife in his back. His back started to bleed. He raised
alarm and sat down there. Shop Keeper Munna and one Halke who were standing
there had seen accused inflicting him knife blow. Munna asked who had given the
blow then he told him that it was his uncle's son-in-law.
3. Ramkumar Patel, who was also standing there took out knife from his
back and tied the wound with a towel and brought him to police station along with
knife. He further stated that in the evening of 28.04.1995 Barat had come to
Phoolchand Yadav's house and there his Raipurawala son-in-law was creating
ruckus after consuming liquor. At this, he and others had scolded him. Over that
issue, he gave a knife blow on his back with an intention to kill him. An FIR was
registered at Crime No.243/95 of P.S. Ranjhi for commission of offence under
Section 307 IPC by ASI R.S. Singh (PW-1) on the basis of narration given by
Santosh (PW-4). R.S. Singh (PW-1) sent him to Victoria Hospital for medical
examination. He seized blood stained knife from witness Ramkumar and prepared
seizure memo Ex.P/5. He prepared spot map Ex.P/4. He seized blood stained
clothes of injured Santosh and prepared seizure memo Ex.P/6. In Victoria Hospital
Dr. M.M. Agrawal (PW-2) examined injured Santosh and gave MLC report
Ex.P/3. He referred him to Medical College for further treatment. In Medical
College, Dr. A.K. Tondar (PW-5) examined Santosh and found an incised wound
over right side of his chest and found this injury dangerous to life in the ordinary
course of nature. He gave his report Ex.P/10. Next day i.e. on 29.04.1995
Purushottam Singh (PW-6) Naib Tehsildar recorded dying declaration Ex.P/10 of
Santosh. After investigation, police Ranjhi filed a charge sheet against the present
appellant Lokman before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, who in its
turn, committed the case to the Court of Session.
4. Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur framed charges against the
accused for commission of offence under Section 307 of IPC. Accused abjured
his guilt and claimed to be tried.
5. In order to prove its case, the prosecution has examined seven
prosecution witnesses namely R.S. Singh (PW-1), Dr. M.M.Agrawal (PW-2),
Mahendra Singh Sahu (PW-3), Santosh (PW-4), Dr. A.K. Tondar (PW-5),
Purushottam Kumar (PW-6) and M.M. Khan (PW-7) whereas accused person has
2
Digitally signed by BIJU BABY
Date: 2022.04.12 18:53:24 IST
SAN
Signature Not Verified
not examined any witness in support of his case.
6 . Learned Additional Sessions Judge after recording the evidence of
prosecution witness and hearing the parties found the appellant/accused Lokman
guilty for commission of offence under Section 307 of IPC and sentenced him as
aforementioned. Being aggrieved by the conviction and sentence