HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Jahar Singh Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
The petitioner has approached this Court against the order dated
14.12.2021 (Annexure-P-5) whereby, the appeal preferred by the
petitioner has been rejected affirming the order passed by the Sub-
Divisional Officer dated 31.05.2016 (Annexure-P-3).
2.
The land bearing Khasara No.482/29 and 484/2, Patwari Halka
No.30/65, Bandobast No.80, situated at revenue circle Chand, District
Chhindwara was owned and recorded in the name of one Safi Khan S/o
Daraz Khan. The private respondents are legal heirs of late Safi Khan.
According to the petitioner, on 12.12.2006, late Safi Khan sold part
land of aforesaid Khasaras and the remaining land was gifted to the
petitioner by executing a Hiba in presence of witnesses. The petitioner
- 3 -
has states that after execution of Hiba, the petitioner came in
possession of the said property and is residing therein with his family.
He further states that on the basis of Hiba, the name of the petitioner
came to be recorded in the Municipal record. On 15.06.2015 i.e. after
the death of Safi Khan, the names of private respondents came to be
recorded in the revenue record in place of Safi Khan notwithstanding
the fact that after execution of Hiba, the pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.