HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Yashsvi Bharil – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
The counsel for the petitioner and also for complainant appeared with the parties and they stated before the Court that they have entered into compromise and settled their dispute, therefore, the complainant does not want to prosecute the matter against the petitioner and as such, the criminal proceedings initiated against the present petitioner in pursuance to their complaint registered vide FIR No.637/2021 at Police Station Gorakhpur, District Jabalpur for the offence punishable under Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code be quashed.
2 . This petition is under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the petitioner saying that he has been falsely implicated in the alleged offence by the police despite the fact that the complainant and the witnesses have not taken the name of present petitioner.
3. As per the case of prosecution, on 02.11.2021, the injured namely Ravi Kumar Prajapati S/o Late Ramdas Prajapati became unconscious as he sustained a gun shot injury, but he has not seen any of the accused persons, therefore, the statement of eye witness namely Smt. Parvati Prajapati, the mother of the present petitioner, was recorded and as such, Dehati Nalishi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.