SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3139

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Yashsvi Bharil – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Mala Singh,Advocate General

ORDER

The counsel for the petitioner and also for complainant appeared with the parties and they stated before the Court that they have entered into compromise and settled their dispute, therefore, the complainant does not want to prosecute the matter against the petitioner and as such, the criminal proceedings initiated against the present petitioner in pursuance to their complaint registered vide FIR No.637/2021 at Police Station Gorakhpur, District Jabalpur for the offence punishable under Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code be quashed.

2 . This petition is under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the petitioner saying that he has been falsely implicated in the alleged offence by the police despite the fact that the complainant and the witnesses have not taken the name of present petitioner.

3. As per the case of prosecution, on 02.11.2021, the injured namely Ravi Kumar Prajapati S/o Late Ramdas Prajapati became unconscious as he sustained a gun shot injury, but he has not seen any of the accused persons, therefore, the statement of eye witness namely Smt. Parvati Prajapati, the mother of the present petitioner, was recorded and as such, Dehati Nalishi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top