Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Shri Justice Rajendra Kumar Srivastava, J
Rikhi Ram Soni – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of creating forged loan documents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defense challenges the basis for charges against him. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. clarification on legal standards for charge framing. (Para 6 , 10 , 12 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. emphasis on existence of prima facie evidence. (Para 14 , 19) |
| 5. final verdict on the dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 20) |
ORDER
(28.10.2021)
This revision petition under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C . has been preferred by the applicants being aggrieved by the order dated 25.04.2018 in S.T.No.73/2017 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Pawai, District-Panna, whereby the learned ASJ has framed the charges against the applicants for the offences punishable under Sections 467 /34, 468/34, 471/34, 420/34 and 120-B of the IPC.
2. According to prosecution case, complainant-Gulab Lodhi has filed a written complaint before the concerning Police Station stating therein that on 19.03.2015, he came to knowledge that one Lappu Lal, who residing in the same village of the complainant, has prepared forged documents in the name of complainant for taking KCC loan and also withdrew the amount of Rs.94,500/-out of Rs.98,000/-as sanctioned. Actually, before two years
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
