1
CRRFC No. 5/2020
(In. Ref. (Suo Moto) Vs. Yogesh Nath @ Jogesh Nath)
&
CRA No. 4965/2020
Yogesh Nath @ Jogesh Nath Vs. The State of MP
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
BENCH AT GWALIOR
DIVISION
BENCH:
BEFORE: G.S. AHLUWALIA
AND
RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA, JJ.
CRIMINAL REFERENCE CASE NO. 05/2020
In Reference (Suo Moto)
Vs.
Yogesh Nath @ Jogesh Nath
Shri Rajesh Shukla along with Shri Rajiv Upadhyay, counsel for
the State.
Shri Vivek Jain along with Shri S.S. Kushwah, counsel for the
respondent.
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 4965/2020
Yogesh Nath @ Jogesh Nath
Vs.
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Shri Vivek Jain along with Shri S.S. Kushwah, counsel for the
appellant.
Shri Rajesh Shukla along with Shri Rajiv Upadhyay, counsel for
the respondent/State.
Reserved on
:
26th August, 2021.
Whether approved for reporting
:
Yes.
2
CRRFC No. 5/2020
(In. Ref. (Suo Moto) Vs. Yogesh Nath @ Jogesh Nath)
&
CRA No. 4965/2020
Yogesh Nath @ Jogesh Nath Vs. The State of MP
Advocate General,
(Passed on 08/09/2021)
Per
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J.:
This judgment shall govern the disposal of Criminal
Reference Case No. 05/2020 as well as Criminal Appeal No.
4965/2020, as both arise out of judgment dated 16.09.2020 passed
by Fifth Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge (Protection of
Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012), Gwalior (MP) in
Special Sessions Trial No. 122/2017.
2.
As per Criminal Reference Case No.05/2020, Fifth
Additional Sessions Judge & Special Judge (Protection of
Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012), Gwalior (MP) vide
judgment dated 16.09.2020 in Special Sessions Trial No.
122/2017, having found the accused guilty under Sections 363,
377, 302, 201 (Part-1) of IPC and under Section 3/4 of Protection
of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred
to as the 'POCSO Act'), has inflicted penalty of death sentence and
has submitted the matter for confirmation under Section 366 of
Cr.P.C.
3.
Criminal Appeal No.4965/2020 has been filed by the
accused from jail against the aforesaid judgment, whereby he has
been convicted and sentenced as under :-
3
Convicted
under
Sections
Act
Imprisonment Fine
In
default,
punishment
363
IPC
07 Years RI
Rs.2,000/-
01 month RI
3/ 4
POCSO 10 Years RI
Rs.2,000/-
01 month RI
302
IPC
Death Sentence -
-
201 Part-I
IPC
07 Years RI
Rs.2,000/-
01 month RI
377
IPC
As per para 101 of trial Court's judgment
It was also directed in the judgment that all the punishments
of imprisonment shall run concurrently.
4.
The short facts of the case are that on 28.04.2017, Ashok
Adiwasi along with his family members, his wife Jasoda,
daughters Pooja, Arti and sons Daulat & deceased 'A', attended the
marriage ceremony of Varsha, who is the daughter of Dharmendra.
Deceased 'A' was aged around 10 years. After attending the
marriage function Ashok Aadiwasi returned back home with his
family members excluding deceased 'A'. As deceased 'A' was
missing, hence Ashok Aadiwasi tried to search the deceased 'A'
but his efforts left in vain. On the next day morning, he was
informed that dead body of deceased 'A' is found in the dug of
village Bara and the body of deceased 'A' is nude. This
information was furnished to the Police Station Bahodapur. On
account of that, Hemlata, Sub-Inspector of Police Station
Bahodapur reached on the spot and recorded Dehati Nalishi. On
the basis of Dehati Nalishi, thereafter FIR was set into motion at
4
Crime No. 260/2017 and offence was registered under Sections
377, 302, 201 of IPC and under Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, on
29.04.2017, i.e., Ex.P/15.
5.
After registration of FIR, investigation was set into the
motion and blood-stained soil, plain soil, one check design light
blue coloured shirt, one black pant, one towel (safi) were seized
and two packets of Chuski from the pant-pocket were seized vide
Ex.P/2 by Hemlata Jatav (PW-13). Lash Panchnama (Ex.P/3) was
prepared in the presence of witnesses Ashok Aadiwasi, Mohd.
Jamiluddin, Sharif Khan, Gagan Singh and Kallu. Spot map was
prepared on 29.04.2017, i.e., Ex.P/4. Post-mortem was done
wherein the doctor had opined that death was homicidal in nature.
Ante-mortem injuries were found over the body caused by hard
and blunt object. There was evidence of penetrative anal assault
(anal injury was evident). Accused was arrested by Ex.P/11.
Viscera of the deceased was collected and sent for forensic
examination. DNA were collected. Accused was medically
examined by Ex.P/9, wherein the doctor had opined that the
accused was young, healthy male person, his secondary sexual
characters were well developed. Nothing was suggestive that the
accused was unable to perform sexual intercourse. One reddish
5