HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Munabbar Ali (Shah) – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
The present revision is filed under section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by the order dated 12.1.2024 passed by II ASJ, Narsingarh whereby against the applicant charge under sections 294, 323, 326 and 506(I) IPC have been framed.
2. Counsel for applicant submits that as per prosecution case, allegation against the present applicant is that he had caused injury to the victim with the help of stone and therefore, the charge under section 326 IPC has been wrongly (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE framed, at the most the charge under section 325 IPC shall be made out.
3. Counsel for the State submits that allegation against the applicant is that he had caused injury on the head of the victim with the help of stone which resulted into fracture, therefore the court has rightly framed charge under section 326 IPC.
4. To appreciate the aforesaid submission, it is apposite to refer section 326 IPC which is reproduced below :-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.