J U D G M E N T

Per: Justice Binod Kumar Dwivedi With the consent of the parties these appeals are being heard finally.

Regard being had to the similitude in the controversy involved and Signature Not Verified commonality of parties, both the appeals are analogously heard and are being disposed of by common order.

2. In F.A.No.1082/2016 appellant is husband-Rajesh and in F.A.No.920/2024, appellant is wife-Neha and minor daughter divyanshi. F.A.No.1082/2016 has been preferred by the appellant/husband under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1984' ) assailing the judgment dated 22.11.2016 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Mandsaur in HMA Case No.109/2015 whereby petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1955') filed on behalf of the appellant/husband has been dismissed whereas F.A.No.920/2024 has been preferred by the respondent/wife assailing the judgment dated 01.03.2024 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Ratlam in HMA Case No.20- A/2017 whereby her petition filed under Section 9 of the Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights has been dismissed.

3. It is not