SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 38235

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA, J
Shri Hemant Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Atul Kumar Gupta,Himanshu Joshi

ORDER

By this petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

"(i) That the impugned Look Out Circular issued against the Petitioner by the Respondents No.1 & 2 at the instance of respondent No.3 bank may kindly be quashed and/or, (ii) The Respondents be directed to not to obstruct the travel of the Petitioner;

(iii) To allow the cost of this petition with any other appropriate relief(s) may kindly be granted to the petitioner and, (iv) To pass any other or further orders) deemed fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the matter."

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the Division Bench Judgment of the High Court of Bombay in W.P.

No.719 of 2020 (Viraj Chetan Shah V. Union of India Through the Ministry of Home Affairs and Another) and other connected writ petitions reported in 1 WP-29569-2022 NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2024:MPHC-IND:31470 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 1195. Attention has been drawn of this Court to paragraph Nos. 194 to 196 in which it has been held as under:

“L. CONCLUSIONS 194. For these reasons, we believe the Petitions will succeed in part. We return to the q

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top