2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 12165
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, PRANAY VERMA, JJ
Bhavya Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
Madhuri Choudhary – Respondent
MCRC 8107/2024
Kartik Raghuwanshi,
Claims in legal proceedings cannot be deemed false solely due to lack of evidence; proof of falsity is required for initiating proceedings under Section 340 of the Cr.P.C.
Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 340 - Application for initiation of proceedings against respondents for false claims in Writ Appeal - Court found no tangible evidence to support allegations of falsehood - Mere lack of evidence does not equate to false claims - Application dismissed for lack of merit. (Paras 2, 8, 11)
(B) False Evidence - Definition and implications - A claim not supported by evidence cannot be deemed false without proof of falsity - Allegations must be substantiated with tangible material. (Paras 6, 9)
(C) Judicial Proceedings - Claims made in legal proceedings are permissible unless proven false - The burden of proof lies with the accuser to demonstrate falsity. (Paras 8, 10)
Facts of the case:
The applicants sought proceedings against the respondents for alleged false claims made in a Writ Appeal, asserting that the respondents did not produce evidence to support their claims.
Findings of Court:
The court found no basis for the allegations of false claims, emphasizing that mere lack of evidence does not imply falsity.
Issues: The main issues were whether the claims made by the respondents were false and if the court should initiate proceedings under Section 340 of the Cr.P.C.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that claims made in legal proceedings cannot be deemed false solely due to lack of evidence, and the applicants failed to substantiate their allegations.
Result: Application dismissed.
1. Learned counsel for the applicants is heard on the question of admission.
2. This application under Section 340 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for initiation of appropriate proceedings against respondents 1, 2 and 3 for flase claims made in Writ Appeal No.793/2023.
3. Before adverting to the averments as made in the application, it would be appropriate to refer to Section 340 of the Cr.P.C. which is as under :- “340. Procedure in cases mentioned in section 195.—(1) When, upon an application made to it in this behalf or otherwise, any Court is of opinion that it is expedient in the interests of Justice that an inquiry should be made into any offence referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 195, which appears to have been committed in or in relation to a proceeding in that Court or, as the case may be, in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in a proceeding in that Court, such Court may, after such preliminary inquiry, if any, as it thinks necessary,— (a) record a finding to that effect;
- (b) make a complaint thereof in writing;
- (c) send it to a Magistrate of the first class having jurisdiction;
- (d) take sufficient security for the appearance of the accused before such Magistrate, or if the alleged offence is non-bailable and the Court thinks it necessary so to do, send the accused in custody to such Magistrate; and (e) bind over any person to appear and give evidence before such Magistrate.
(2) The power conferred on a Court by sub-section (1) in respect of an offence may, in any case where that Court has neither made a complaint under sub-section (1) in respect of that offence nor rejected an application for the making of such complaint, be exercised by the Court to which such former Court is subordinate within the meaning of sub-section (4) of section 195.
(3) A complaint made under this section shall be signed,— (a) where the Court making the complaint is a High Court, by such officer of the Court as the Court may appoint;
1[(b) in any other case, by the presiding officer of the Court or by such officer of the Court as the Court may authorise in writing in this behalf.]
(4) In this section, “Court” has the same meaning as in section 195.”
4. Section 340 of the Cr.P.C. has rerferance to offences in Clause (b) of Sub Section (1) of Section 195 of the Cr.P.C. hence it would be appropriate to refer to the said provision also which is as under :-
- “195. Prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants, for offences against public justice and for offences relating to documents given in evidence.—(1) No Court shall take cognizance— .... .... .... (b) (i) of any offence punishable under any of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), namely, sections 193 to 196 (both inclusive), 199, 200, 205 to 211 (both inclusive) and 228, when such offence is alleged to have been committed in, or in relation to, any proceeding in any Court, or (ii) of any offence described in section 463, or punishable under section 471, section 475 or section 476, of the said Code, when such offence is alleged to have been committed in respect of a document produced or given in evidence in a proceeding in any Court, or (iii) of any criminal conspiracy to commit, or attempt to commit, or the abetment of, any offence specified in sub-clause (i) or sub- clause (ii), [except on the complaint in writing of that Court or by such officer of the Court as that Court may authorise in writing in this behalf, or of some other Court to which that Court is subordinate.]”
5. Section 195(1)(b) of the Cr.P.C. has reference to various offences punishable under the IPC. The applicants have sought action under the follow provisions :-
- “191. Giving false evidence.—Whoever, being legally bound by an oath or by an express provision of law to state the truth, or being bound by law to make a declaration upon any subject, makes any statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false or do