HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Kamla Krishna Sharma – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order date 28.07.2017 passed by respondent No.3 i.e. Inspector General of Police, Chambal Zone, Morena, whereby while exercising suo moto revisional powers as provided under Police Regulations 270(4) the earlier penalty imposed upon the petitioner of stoppage of one increment with non-cumulative effect for one year has been set aside and the matter has been remitted back for fresh departmental inquiry to be conducted against the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner had submitted that on the basis of a complaint made by one Satish Kumar Sharma against the petitioner, a preliminary enquiry was conducted by CSP, Morena and in the preliminary inquiry it was opined that without receiving the expert's report with respect to the recording submitted by the complainant, the petitioner cannot be held guilty. It was further submitted that again the same officer in the said preliminary enquiry further opined the voice recorded by the complainant is that of the petitioner and prepared a report and sent it to the disciplinary authority and on the basis of the said report, preliminary
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.