ORDER

The applicant has filed this SECOND bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail. Applicant has been arrested on 10.10.2021 in Crime No. 333/2021 b y Police Station - Hanumana, District Rewa for the offence punishable under Section 8, 21, 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985 and Section 5/12 of the M.P. Drug Control Act, 1949.

2.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is suffering confinement since 10.10.2021 and some of the material prosecution witnesses including the seizure witnesses have been examined, therefore, chance of tampering with the evidence/ witnesses is remote. It is further submitted that the applicant is neither owner nor driver of the vehicle in question nor he was the person who funded the whole transaction. It is further submitted that the applicant does not bear any criminal record and at best, he was the pillion rider.

3.Learned counsel also raised the point that the drugs, which were seized are cough syrup bottles (Codine) and it does not fall within the ambit of Section 8, 21 and 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act because it is not a manufactured drug per se as per the provisions of N.D.P.S. Act. It was a bottled cough syrup and no ingredients of any narcotics drugs or psychotropic substances were added to it to make it a manufactured drug under the ambit of N.D.P.S. Act. He relied upon the judgment passed by the Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs. Mohanlal and another reported in (2016) 3 SCC 379 and the order dated 31.07.2020 passed by the Delhi High Court in the case of Iqbal Singh Vs. State in Bail Application No. 645/2020 to bring home the fact that it was not a case of a manufactured drug. He further referred the discrepancies crept in the investigation wherein joint consent has been obtained in respect of Section 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act. He relied upon the case of State of Rajasthan Vs. Parmanand and another reported in (2014)5 SCC 345 . He also referred the bail order of co-accused Sandeep Singh dated 5.4.2022 passed in M.Cr.C.No.

13558 of 2022 whereby he was granted the benefit of bail. Learned counsel also raised doubt over the exact quantity of cough syrup because at some places, I.O. has referred bottles as 450 whereas at some places, it is 550 bottles. The present applicant has suffered more than 16 months of incarceration as pre-trial detention. Looking to the status of trial and the period of custody, besides other points raised by the counsel for the applicant, it is submitted that the case of the applicant be considered for bail.

4.Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submitted that as per the allegations, the applicant was instrumental in transportation of 550 bottles of cough syrup. He prayed for dismissal of the bail application.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the case diary.

6. Considering the submissions, especially the status of trial and the period of custody, this Court intends to allow the application but with certain stringent conditions. Therefore, without commenting on the merits of the case, the application is allowed . It is hereby directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) along with two solvent sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

7. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant :-

(i). The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

(ii) The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

(iii) The applicant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

(iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is ac