GWALIOR BENCH
GANESH RAWAT – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 16583 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE
ON THE 18th OF JULY, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 16583 of 2023
BETWEEN:-
GANESH RAWAT S/O SHRI BABU LAL RAWAT, AGED
ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCCUPATION: SERVICE POSTED AS
SECRETARY IN GRAM PANCHAYAT KHERADEGWAR
JANPAD
PANCHAYAT
SABALGARH
,
MORENA
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI DHARMENDRA NAYAK - ADVOCATE)
AND
1.
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
VALLABH
BHAWAN
BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.
THE ZILA PANCHAYAT MORENA THROUGH ITS
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER DISTRICT MORENA ,
(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI SHIRAZ QURAISHI - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)
This petition coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the
following:
ORDER
In the present matter a caveat has been filed by the Gram Panchayat,
where the petitioner is serving as Secretary. The present matter pertains to an
order of transfer dated 07.07.2023 to which the present caveator is foreign to.
Thus, this Court does not find any reason to entertain the caveator.
Accordingly, caveat application is rejected.
Present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution
1
Signed by: NEETU
SHASHANK
Signing time: 19-Jul-23
11:06:24 AM
Signature Not Verified
of India against the order dated 07.07.2023 passed by respondent No.2, CEO
Zila Panchayat, Morena, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Gram
Panchayat Kheradegwar, Janpad Panchayat Sabalgarh to Gram Panchayat
Sikrodi Janpad Panchayat Ambah.
Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the petitioner is presently
holding
the post of Secretary in Gram Panchayat Kheradegwar, Janpad
Panchayat Sabalgarh, District Morena. The mother of the petitioner is old aged
and she is heart patient and her treatment is going on and day to day supervision
under the local doctor of Sabalgarh. The petitioner is only male and active
member in his family to look after his mother's health for an emergency
situation. Due to the impugned transfer order, the petitioner would be unable to
take care of his mother. He further submits that the impugned order is issued
during the ban period, as the ban on transfers were lifted till 30.06.2023. It was
submitted that the petitioner has moved representation Annexure P/9 on
11.07.2023 to the respondent No.2 i.e. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat
Morena, which is lying pending and has not been decided till date. Learned
counsel submits that if respondent No.2 is directed to consider the
representation filed by the petitioner sympathetically and decide it within a time
bound frame, his grievance would be redressed and till then the impugned order
be stayed.
P er contra, learned Government Advocate has no objection if such
directions are issued to the competent authority for deciding the representation,
but opposes the prayer for stay of the transfer order.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Looking to the limited prayer which has been made by the counsel for the
2
Signed by: NEETU
SHASHANK
Signing time: 19-Jul-23
11:06:24 AM
Signature Not Verified
(MILIND RAMESH PHADKE)
JUDGE
petitioner and without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is
disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 i.e. Chief Executive Officer,
Zila Panchayat Morena, to decide the representation as expeditiously as
possible preferably within fifteen days from the date of receipt of certified
copy of this order.
Till the period of Fifteen days or the date the representation is decided,
(whichever is earlier), the effect and operation of the impugned transfer order
dated 07.07.2023 Annexure P/1 shall remain stayed and till then the petitioner
shall not be relieved from his present place of posting.
C c as per rules.
neetu
3
Signed by: NEETU
SHASHANK
Signing time: 19-Jul-23
11:06:24 AM
Signature Not Verified