GWALIOR BENCH
K P SINGH ADVOCATE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
WP 11164 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT GWALIOR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ROHIT ARYA
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SATYENDRA KUMAR SINGH
ON THE 11th OF MAY, 2023
WRIT PETITION NO. 11164 OF 2023
BETWEEN:-
1.
K.P. SINGH ADVOCATE S/O SHRI D.P.
SINGH, AGED : 72 YEARS, OCCUPATION :
MEESA-BANDI PENSIONER, R/O C-63,
GOVINDPURI,
GWALIOR
(MADHYA
PRADESH)
2.
ANOOP AGARWAL S/O LATE SHRI K.L.
AGARWAL, AGED : 55 YEARS,
OCCUPATION : BUSINESS, R/O 105,
AMALTAS BUILDING, GREEN GARDEN,
CITY CENTER, GWALIOR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
….....PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI JITENDRA SHARMA – ADVOCATE )
AND
1.
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
HIGHER
EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT,
GOVERNMENT OF MADHYA PRADESH,
VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA
PRADESH)
2.
JIWAJI UNIVERSITY, CITY CENTER,
GWALIOR THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR,
GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)
2
3.
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT
GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)
4.
S.H.O.
POLICE
STATION,
VISHVAVIDHYALAY, GWALIOR (MADHYA
PRADESH)
….....RESPONDENT
(BY SHRI M.P.S. RAGHGUVANSHI – ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL
WITH SHRI A.K. NIRANKARI - ADVOCATE)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This appeal coming on for admission this day, Hon'ble Shri
Justice ROHIT ARYA passed the following:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORDER
Petitioner No.1 Shri K.P.Singh, S/o Shri D.P.Singh aged about
72 years styles himself as an Advocate along with one Anoop
Agrawal a businessman, who are before this Court through instant
pro bono publico writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India seeking indulgence in the form of directions to order for CBI
enquiry in the matter of examinations conducted by the Jiwaji
University/respondent No.2 for B.Sc. nursing for the academic year
2018-2019.
2.
Shri M.P.S. Raghuvanshi, Additional Advocate General with
Shri A.K.Nirankari, Government Advocate, on advance notice, points
out that petitioner No.1 had earlier approached this Court earlier
seeking indulgence in the matter of consideration of his
representation dated 03.02.2021 by the Kuladhipati, Jiwaji
University, Gwalior by filing W.P. No. 6926/2021. The representation
3
was since already decided on 02.09.2021, this Court closed the writ
petition on 14.02.2022 as infructuous.
3.
Shri Raghuvanshi further submits that by adding one
businessman as the petitioner, petitioner K.P.Singh has now again
approached this Court in the context of the subject matter of
representation dated 03.02.2021 which has already been decided on
02.09.2021. Petitioner has not disclosed the fact of earlier W.P.
No.6926/2021 and the order dated 14.02.2022 disposing of the
petition. To bolster his submissions, Shri Raghuvanshi refers to the
contents of Paragraph 3.9 of the writ petition. The same is quoted
below:-
3.9
That, the complaints/ representations of
the aforesaid mass illegalities and big scam were
made by the petitioners to the chancellar under
Section 13(4) of the Vishvidhyalay Adhiniyam who
opined that there has been a big corruption in the
aforesaid scam and false mark sheets have been
issued which is a serious financial irregularities in a
quid pro quo manner, as such F.I.R. should be
registered but the representation made by the
petitioner no.1 under section 13(4) of Adhiniyam,
1973 was disallowed. Copies of the said
representations and a copy of the order issued by
Hon'ble Chancellor is filed herewith and marked as
Annexure- P/7 (Colly).
4.
Shri Raghuvanshi submits that a bare reading of the said
4
pleading, suggests that the Chancellor of the University under Section
14(3) [not 13(4)] of the Madhya Pradesh Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam,
1973 (in short “Adhiniyam”) has opined that there has been big
corruption in the alleged scam and false marksheets have been issued,
which is