HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ramkumar Charmakar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is
heard finally.
2. The singular point needs determination in this case is regarding the age
of retirement of petitioner working as Sahayak Adhyapak in Adhyapak
Samvarg (cadre).
3. The petitioner was working as Shiksha Karmi, Grade-III and by order
dated 11.10.2007 (Annexure RJ-1), he was absorbed as Sahayak Adhyapak.
The respondents by order dated 18.10.2016 (Annexure P-1) retired the
petitioner on attaining the age of 60 years.
4. Shri Sanjay Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after
having been absorbed as Sahayak Adhyapak, the petitioner's services are
governed by statutory rules namely Madhya Pradesh Panchyat Adhyapak
Samvarg (Employment & Conditions of Services) Rules 2008 made in
exercise of power confirmed under Sub Section 1 of Section 95 r/w Sub
Section 2 of Section 70 of M.P. Panchyat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj
Adhiniyam 1993. As per Rule 8 (d), r/w Schedule-I, of Rules of 2008, the
petitioner's post (Sahayak Adhapak) is classified in 'Adhyapak Samvarg' and,
therefore, he was entitled to retire on attaining the age of superannuation on
completion of 62 years of service. The respondents ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.