SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Pramod Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Arpan Shrivastava,Advocate General

(Pronounced on 22/04/2021)

Per: Mohammad Rafiq, C.J.

1.

This matter has been referred to the Division Bench in view of

difference of opinion expressed by two Single Benches of this Court in Mohd.

Juned vs. State of M.P. reported in 2016(1) MPJR 108 and in Smt. Sunita

Gandharva vs. State of M.P. and another in MCRC No.22615/2020.

2.

The present matter in which the order of reference has been made, has

been filed as a Criminal Appeal under Section 14-A(1) of the Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short

“the Atrocities Act”) against the order dated 23.07.2020 passed by Special

Judge, Atrocities Act, Seoni in SC ATR No.08/2020. In fact, earlier appeal

filed by appellant viz. Criminal Appeal No.10267/2019, was dismissed as

[3]

withdrawn vide order dated 10.12.2019 with liberty to him to file afresh

appeal after recording of the statement of the prosecutrix.

3.

The facts of the case in brief are that the police station Keolari, District

Seoni registered Crime No.314/2019 against the accused/appellant for offence

punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n), 376(3) of IPC, Section 5(L)

and 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top