SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 15132

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Anubai – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Nitin Phadke,Advocate General

As the controversy involved in all these petitions is identical,

therefore, they are being decided by this common order. For the sake of

convenience, the facts narrated in W.P.No.13204/2022 are being taken

-4-

into consideration.

2. The private respondents approached the Tehsildar under Section 129

of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 seeking demarcation

of boundaries of their land with an allegation that the present petitioners

have encroached their land. The Tehsildar directed for demarcation

through Revenue Inspector, who conducted the demarcation and

submitted the report to the Tehsildar in favor of the petitioners. The

Tehsildar under Sub-Section (4) of section 129 of MPLRC has

confirmed the said demarcation report.

3.

After nine months, the respondents exercised their right of appeal

under Section 129 (5) of the MPLRC by filing an appeal before the

SDO. The appeal was taken up on 03.09.2020 by the Sub-Divisional

Officer, Sendhwa and on very first date passed an order under Section

129 (5) & (6) of the MPLRC for fresh demarcation. When the

petitioners received the notice of the demarcation, they reached to the

spot and thereafter submitted an objection befo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top