SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(MP) 6067

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sunita – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Its Collector – Respondent


Advocates:
Ajay Bagadia,Advocate General

O R D E R

( Delivered on this 16 th December, 2020)

Per S. C. Sharma, J.:

The appellant before this Court has filed present writ appeal under Section 2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 being aggrieved by order dated 01/10/2020 passed by learned Single Judge in Miscellaneous Petition No.5156/2019 (Smt. Sunita W/o Rajesh Bairagi & 29 Others Vs.

State of Madhya Pradesh & Others).

02- The facts of the case as stated in the writ appeal reveal that the respondent No.4 claiming himself to be the owner of land bearing Survey No.66/2/K admeasuring 0.720 hectares, 73/4/2 admeasuring 0.315 hectares, 74 admeasuring 0.523 hectares, 75/3 admeasuring 0.396 hectares, 83/2 admeasuring 0.554 hectares and 84/2 admeasuring 0.683 hectares has filed an application for demarcation of land and the demarcation was carried out with the aid of T.S.M. machine on 15/12/2016. The demarcation report was submitted by the Revenue Inspector and Patwari to the Tehsildar and based upon the demarcation report the respondent No.4 has preferred an application under Section 250 of the M. P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the “MPLRC”) for restoration o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top