SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2771

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Gagan Choudhary – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Shafiqullah,Advocate General

    ORDER

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally.

This application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. assails the order dated 20.5.2022 passed in S.T. No.411/2021, whereby the application preferred by the applicant under Section 311 of Cr.P.C dated 28.4.2022 is dismissed by the court below.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a poor person, who was given legal aid by the department. Since his previous legal aid counsel did not effectively cross - examine the prosecution witnesses, the PW-1, PW-4, PW-5, PW-6 and PW-7 may be recalled for their cross- I.L.R. (2014)

M.P. 246 (Prakash and others Vs. State of M.P.). Government's counsel supported the impugned order.

I have gone through the impugned order, in which reliance is placed on

2019 CRI. L.J. 4579

(Ballu Khan @ Ballu Kha @ Jahoor Shah Vs. State of M.P.). Cr.R. No.5615 of 2019

"Learned Court below has considered the judgment of this Court in Hari Singh (supra) and based its judgment on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Yakub Ismail Bhai Patel (supra). Learned counsel for the applicant has not brought those judgments to show that the Court below has committed an error

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top