SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2479

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ghanshyam Baser – Appellant
Versus
Jyoti – Respondent


Advocates:
Tushar Bhedasgaonkar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAJENDRA SINGH th ON THE 27 OF MARCH, 2025 FIRST APPEAL No. 1793 of 2023 GHANSHYAM BASER Versus JYOTI Appearance:

Shri Tushar Bhedasgaonkar - Advocate for the appellant.

ORDER Per: Justice Gajendra Singh This first appeal filed under Section 28(4) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 has been preferred by the husband, being partially aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 17.07.2023 passed in RCS HM No.12-A/2023 by First Additional Judge, Garoth, District Mandsaur, under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The appellant/husband has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.12,000/- per month as maintenance to respondent/wife before the

7th of every month.

2. Facts in brief are that appellant/husband preferred an application under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of marriage solemnized on 08.05.2009 as per Hindu Rituals. The application was filed on 23.03.2023 & respondent/wife remained ex-parte before the trial Court and after recording the evidence of the appellant/husband trial Court Signature Not Verified Signed by: AKANKSHA granted

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top