SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 50366

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sheikh Akeel Qureshi – Appellant
Versus
Amarlal – Respondent


Advocates:
Pradeep Singh Chouhan,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI th ON THE 8 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 MISC. APPEAL No. 1651 of 2018 BETWEEN:-

SHEIKH AKEEL QURESHI S/O SHRI SHABBIR QURESHI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, JHOPADI NO. 521, GURUNANAK WARD NO. 18 PATHAKHEDA SARNI, TEH.

GHODADONGRI, (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....APPELLANT (BY SHRI SARVESH JAISWAL -ADVOCATE )

AND

1. AMARLAL S/O ANGAD PRASAD DAHIYA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, PODIKALA, P.S. BEOHARI, DISTRICT SHAHDOL (M.P.) AT PRESENT DILIP BUILDCOM CO. LTD. CAMP GHODADONGRI (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. DILIP BUILDCOM CO. LTD THR. DEVENDRA JAIN R/O S.V.P.S. FALODI COLONY RAJGARH, (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. IFFCO TOKYO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

NEAR HABIBGANJ RAILWAY STATION BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (BY MS. AMRIT KAUR RUPRAH - ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT NO.3/INSURANCE COMPANY AND SHRI ARPAN SHRIVASTAV -

ADVOCATE FOR THE RESPONDENT NO.2)

This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

Heard.

Signature Not Verified Signed by: AKANKSHA

2. This miscellaneous appeal has been preferred by the appellants/claimants for enhancement of the amount awarded by IInd Additional MACT, Betul in M.C.C. No. 234/2015 wher

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top