SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 52444

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Bhawanilal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Nilesh Dave,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA th ON THE 13 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 4205 of 2024 BETWEEN:-

1. BHAWANILAL S/O MATHURALAL KHAROL, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: LABOUR RAGASPARIYA (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. GAJANAND S/O MATHURALAL KHAROL, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: LABOUR RAGASPARIYA, DISTT. MANDSAUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....APPLICANTS (BY SHRI NILESH DAVE, ADVOCATE)

AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH STATION HOUSE OFFICER THROUGH P.S. BHANPURA DIST. MANDSAUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENT (BY SHRI VISHAL PANWAR - G.A.)

This application coming on for orders this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

This is first application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the applicants, relating to FIR/Crime No.06/2024 registered at P.S. Bhanpura, District Mandsaur (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 of IPC.

2. Counsel for the applicants submits that present applicants are illiterate persons and they only put their thumb impression on the document on Signature Not Verified Signed by: MUKTA pursuation made by main accused Rohit. They had applied for l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top