SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 53859

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Govardhan – Appellant
Versus
Satya Narayan & Ors – Respondent
SA 550/2002



Advocates:
Dk.,A.Dixit,Manoj Mishra,Mk.Mishra,Ajay Ojha[1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL th ON THE 19 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 SECOND APPEAL No. 550 of 2002 BETWEEN:-

GOVARDHAN SON OF SHRI JAGANNATH MAJOR, RESIDENT OF CHINTAMAN CHOWK, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....APPELLANT (NONE)

AND SATYANARAYAN SON OF SHRI PHOOLCHAND AGRAWAL, MAJOR, R/O SOUFIYA COLLEGE, ROAD, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2-A SMT. DEVA BAI W/O LATE RADHAVALLABH R/O H.NO 102, CHINTAMAN CHOWK, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)SATYA NARAYAN & ORS (MADHYA PRADESH)

2-B MOHANLAL SON OF RADHAVALLABH, R/O JAMNAKUNJ APARTMENT, GUNJBAHADUR TALKIES KE PASS, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2-C VISHNU KUMAR SON OF LATE RADHA- VALLABH, R/O H.NO.102, CHINTAMAN CHOWK, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH).

2-D(i) SMT. KRISHNA W/O LATE SHRI KANHAIYA LAL MAJOR, R/O JAMNAKUNJ, INFRONT OF GUNJBAHADUR TALKIES, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2-D(ii) NARAYAN SON OF LATE SHRI KANHAIYALAL, R/O JAMNAKUNJ, INFRONT OF GUNJBAHADUR TALKIES, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2-D(iii) PANKAJ SON OF LATE SHRI KANHAIYALAL,R/O JAMNAKUNJ, INFRONT OF GUNJBAHADUR TALKIES, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

Signature Not Verified

2-D(iv) KU PINKI D/O LATE SHRI KANHAIYALAL, MINOR, THROUGH MOTHER & NATURAL GUARDIAN SMT. KRISHNA W/O LATE KANHAIYALAL, R/O JAMNAKUNJ, INFRONT OF GUNJBAHADUR TALKIES, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2-E SMT REKHA D/O LATE SHRI RADHAVALLABH W/O RAJENDRA SHARMA, R/O E-2/300, ARERA COLONY, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2-F SMT SHOBHA D/O LATE SHRI RADHAVALLABH W/O SHRI ANIL SHARMA, R/O E-7/101, ARERA COLONY, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2-G SMT. SIMA D/O LATE SHRI RADHAVALLABH W/O SHRI VIVEK SHARMA, R/O 189, GOUTAM NAGAR, BAIRASIYA ROAD, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2-H SMT. RAMA D/O LATE SHRI RADHAVALLABH W/O SHRI MUKUL, R/O E-6X138, ARERA COLONY BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (SHRI SAKET MALLIK - ADVOCATE)

This appeal coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

None for the appellant.

2. It appears that the appellant has lost his interest in prosecuting this second appeal.

3 . Resultantly, this second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution with cost of Rs.5,000/- (Rs. five thousand only).

4. It is made clear that, if any application for restoration is filed, the deposition of cost of Rs.5,000/- with the State Legal Services Authority, Jabalpur shall be a condition precedent to entertain the application for restoration, if any.

5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand dismissed.

Signature Not Verified (DWARKA DHISH BANSAL)

JUDGE ss Signature Not Verified

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top