SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 51044

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Guljar & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
The State Of M.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Sanjay Ram Tamrakar/,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI th ON THE 20 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1398 of 2000 BETWEEN:-

1. GULJAR S/O DILIP SINGH RAJPUT, AGED ABOUT

40 YEARS, KELKACHHA POLICE STATION SAIKHEDA DISTRICT NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. AKHILESH KUMAR S/O TRIBUWAN SINGH RAJPUT, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, KELKACHHA POLICE STATION SAIKHEDA DISTRICT NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. CHHOTE SINGH S/O DILIP SINGH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, KELKACHHA POLICE STATION SAIKHEDA DISTRICT NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....APPELLANTS (BY SHRI SANJAY RAM TAMRAKAR - ADVOCATE)

AND THE STATE OF M.P., THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION SAIKHEDA DISTT.

NARSINGHPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENT/STATE (BY SHRI NARENDRA LODHI - PANEL LAWYER)

This appeal coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the following:

J U D G E M E N T

This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is filed by the appellants being aggrieved of the judgment dated 10/5/2000 passed by the learned Special Judge (Atrocities), Narsinghppur in Special case No.43/1999, whereby the appellants have been convicted under Signature Not Verified Sig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top