SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Mp) 35055

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Mangal Teli – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MP 481/2022



Advocates:
Manoj Kumar Pandey,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DWARKA DHISH BANSAL th ON THE 12 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 MISC. PETITION No. 481 of 2022 BETWEEN:-

MANGAL TELI S/O SHRI RAMDHANI TELI, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST VILLAGE BADHAIYA POLICE STATION AND TEH.

HANUMANA DIST. REWA MP (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER (BY SHRI MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY, ADVOCATE)

AND

1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH COLLECTOR REWA DIST. REWA MP (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER REWA REWA DIVISION REWA M.P. (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. TEHSILDAR TEHSIL HANUMANA TEHSIL HANUMANA DISTRICT REWA (M.P) (MADHYA PRADESH)

4. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (REVENUE)

HANUMANA HANUMANA DISTRICT REWA (M.P)

(MADHYA PRADESH)

5. SHAILENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI PADUMRAJ SINGH OCCUPATION: NILL R/O- SITAPURA, LUCKNOW (U.P.), AT PRESENT R/O- VILLAGE BADHAIYA, TEHSIL- HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)

6. KAUSHLENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI PADUMRAJ SINGH OCCUPATION: NILL R/O- SITAPURA, LUCKNOW (U.P.), AT PRESENT R/O- VILLAGE BADHAIYA, TEHSIL- HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)

7. VIMLESH SINGH S/O SHRI KAMALRAJ SINGH OCCUPATION: NILL R/O- SITAPURA, LUCKNOW (U.P.), AT PRESENT R/O- VILLAGE BADHAIYA, TEHSIL- HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)

8. KAMAL SINGH S/O SHRI KAMALRAJ OCCUPATION: NILL R/O- SITAPURA, LUCKNOW (U.P.), AT PRESENT R/O- VILLAGE BADHAIYA, TEHSIL- HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)

9. MUS. MEENA SINGH W/O SHRI KAMALRAJ OCCUPATION: NILL R/O- SITAPURA, LUCKNOW (U.P.), AT PRESENT R/O- VILLAGE BADHAIYA, TEHSIL- HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)

10. PUSHPENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI BHAIYALAL SINGH OCCUPATION: NILL R/O- VILLAGE BADHAIYA, TEHSIL- HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)

11. JAGDISH (DIED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS, UDAY PRATAP SINGH S/O LATE JAGDISH SINGH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIRED GOVT. SERVENT R/O- VILLAGE BADHAIYA, POST- DUGAWAN, POLICE STATION AND TEHSIL-

HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)

12. RAJESH SINGH S/O LATE JAGDISH SINGH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST R/O- VILLAGE BADHAIYA, POST-DUGAWAN, POLICE STATION AND TEHSIL- HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)

13. NARENDRA BAHADUR SINGH S/O LATE JAGDISH SINGH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCCUPATION: GOVERNMENT SERVENT R/O- VILLAGE BADHAIYA, POST-DUGAWAN, POLICE STATION AND TEHSIL- HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)

14. SMT. KUSUM SINGH, D/O JAGDISH SINGH W/O SHRI DIWAKER SINGH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE R/O- VILLAGE BADHAIYA, POST-DUGAWAN, POLICE STATION AND TEHSIL- HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)

15. SMT. PUSHPA SINGH, D/O LATE SHRI JAGDISH SINGH W/O SHRI RAJBHAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST R/O- VILLAGE BADHAIYA, POST-DUGAWAN, POLICE STATION AND TEHSIL- HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)

16. CHANDRAMANI SINGH S/O CHANDRAVIJAY SINGH KSHATRI OCCUPATION: NILL R/O- VILLAGE BADHAIYA, TEHSIL- HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)

17. BRAJENDRA BAHADUR SINGH S/O CHANDRAVIJAY SINGH KSHATRI OCCUPATION: NILL R/O- VILLAGE BADHAIYA, TEHSIL-

HANUMANA (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI BRIJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS

5-10)

(BY SHRI ESHWAR DAS VAISHY, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS 11, 12, 13, 17)

(BY SHRI MUKUND AGRAWAL, GOVT. ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT-

STATE)

This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

After arguments at length, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this miscellaneous petition with liberty to file civil suit seeking declaration of his rights and consequential relief(s), if any.

2. Prayer being reasonable is accepted and this miscellaneous petition is permitted to be withdrawn and is hereby disposed off with the aforesaid liberty. 3. If such a civil suit is filed within a period of 45 days from today, the orders passed by Tahsildar, SDO and Commissioner shall remain subject to final outcome of the civil suit, if any, filed by the petitioner within the aforesaid period and both the parties shall maintain status quo in respect of the suit property till the decision of the civil suit.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case.

5. Pending

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top