SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Mp) 35197

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Jagannath – Appellant
Versus
Ramchandra – Respondent


Advocates:
Ghan Shyam Yadav,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEVNARAYAN MISHRA st ON THE 1 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 SECOND APPEAL No. 303 of 2020 BETWEEN:-

JAGANNATH S/O PUNAJI MARU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST VILLAGE BARKHEDA TEHSIL SARDARPUR DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....APPELLANT (BY SHRI A.S. GARG - SENIOR COUNSEL WITH SHRI ADITYA GARG -

ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT)

AND

1. RAMCHANDRA S/O NANDRAM MARU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST VILLAGE BARKHEDA TEHSIL SARDARPUR DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. BAGDIRAM S/O NANDRAM MARU, AGED ABOUT

48 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST VILLAGE BARKHEDA, TEHSIL SARDARPUR, DIST DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. MUNNIBAI W/O SHANTILAL, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST VILLAGE BARKHEDA, TEHSIL SARDARPUR, DIST DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

4. STATE OF MP, THROUGH COLLECTOR COLLECTOR DHAR DIST DHAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

Signature Not Verified Signed by: RASHMI This second appeal has been filed being aggrieved with the judgment and decree passed on 04.11.2019 by First Additional District Judge, Sardarpur, District Dhar in RCA No. 21/2017 by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top