SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 36239

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rinku Verman – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
MCRC 5502/2024



Advocates:
Dharmendra Kumar Pandey,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAMOD KUMAR AGRAWAL th ON THE 5 OF MARCH, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 5502 of 2024 BETWEEN:-

RINKU VERMAN S/O GOVIND VERMAN, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCCUPATION: LABOUR R/O CHANDIGANJ KATRA MAIHAR POLICE STATION MAIHAR DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....APPLICANT (BY SHRI DHEERENDRA PANDEY - ADVOCATE)

AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH POLICE STATION MAIHAR DISTRICT SATNA (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. GEETA YADAV - PANEL LAWYER)

This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

This is the first bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail relating to Crime No. 77/2024 registered at Police Station - Maihar District Satna (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of M.P. Excise Act. Applicant is in detention since 21/01/2024.

2. As per the prosecution story, on receiving an information from an informant, 63 bulk liters of illicit liquor has been seized from possession of the applicant. Therefore, FIR was registered against the applicant.

Signature Not Verified Signed by: NAVEEN

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is in jail since 21/01/2024. Applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated. Offence is triable by JMFC. Charge sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time. Therefore, it has been prayed that the applicant may be released on bail pending the trial.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for State has opposed the grant of bail to the applicant on the basis of criminal past.

5. Having taken into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without commenting on merit of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. Consequently, bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail filed on behalf of applicant, stands allowed

6. It is directed that applicant be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, for his regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he shall remain present before the concerned Court on all the dates fixed by it during trial. He shall abide by all the conditions enumerated under Section

437(3) of Cr.P.C.

7. This order shall be effective till the end of the trial. However, in case of bail jump and breach of any of the conditions of bail, it shall become ineffective.

Certified copy as per rules.

(PRAMOD KUMAR AGRAWAL)

Signature Not Verified Signed by: NAVEEN JUDGE navin Signature Not Verified Signed by: NAVEEN

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top