SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 37221

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rajesh Pandey – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Suyash Mohan Guru,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI th ON THE 14 OF MARCH, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 16415 of 2014 BETWEEN:-

1. RAJESH PANDEY S/O SHRI RAMSEVAK PANDEY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, VILL. KHAJRI P.S.

PATHARIA (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. SHIVCHARAN PANDEY S/O SHRI SHANKARILAL PANDEY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, VILLAGE KHAJRI, POLICE STATION PATHARIA, DISTT.

DAMOH (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. RAMPRAKASH GAUTAM S/O SHRI RAMDAYAL GAUTAM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, VILLAGE PEPAR KHIRAIYA, POLICE STATION PATHARIA DISTT. DAMOH (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....APPLICANT (BY SHRI SUYASH MOHAN GURU - ADVOCATE)

AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH P.S. PATHARIA DAMOH (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (BY MS. SHANTI TIWARI - PANEL LAWYER)

This application coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 02/09/2014 passed by 1st Additional Session Judge, District Damoh in Sessions Trial No.180/2013.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pertaining to an Signature Not Verified incident dated 06/06/2013, the complainant/petitioner No.1 Rajesh Pandey lodged an FI

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top