2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 37287
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vinay Davis – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
WP 5635/2024
Dinesh Kumar Upadhyay,Advocate General
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI th ON THE 15 OF MARCH, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 5635 of 2024 BETWEEN:-
VINAY DAVIS S/O LATE SHRI PATEL DAVIS, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCCUPATION: ADVOCATE JR MIG 83 OLD SUBHASH NAGAR BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER (BY SHRI DINESH UPADHYAY - ADVOCATE)
AND
1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH TRHOUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AUDHYOGIK NITI AVAM NIVESH PROTSAHAN VIBHAG VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. REGISTRAR REGISTRAR FIRMS AND SOCIETY
1ST FLOOR BLOCK-G VINDHAYANCHAL BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR FIRMS AND SOCIETY JABALPUR DIVISION UDHYOG BHAWAN NEAR T.V. TOWER KATANGA JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN MP (ELC IN MP) A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISION OF SOCIETY REGISTRIKARAN ADHINIYAM 1973 REGISTERED OFFICE LUTHER BHAWAN PO BOX 30 CHHINDWARA THROUGH BRIJESH NITIN SAHAY SECRETARY IN ELC IN MP R/O LUTHER BHAWAN PO BOX 30 CHHINDWARA (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS Signature Not Verified Signed by: AJAY KUMAR (BY SHRI PRADEEP SINGH - GOVT. ADVOCATE )
This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the grievance of the petitioner as highlighted vide Annexure-P/9 is to be taken cognizance of by the respondents as regards appointment of Administrator for the Management of Evangelical Lutheran Church in M.P.. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the concerned respondents be directed to take a decision on the representation submitted by the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the State submits that the representation of the petitioner shall be dealt with by the respondents No.2 and 3 in accordance with law.
3. Considering the aforesaid innocuous prayer, the present petition stands disposed of with the direction to the respondents No.2 and 3 to take a decision on the representation, dated 18-12-2023 contained in Annexure-P/9, of the petitioner within a period of ninety days from the date of production of certified copy of this order, while extending opportunity of hearing to all concerned, including the respondent No.5.
4. It is made clear that there is no expression on merits of the case, the respondents/authorities in their own wisdom, shall deal with the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law.
5. With the aforesaid, the present writ petition stands disposed of.
(MANINDER S. BHATTI)
JUDGE ac Signature Not Verified Signed by: AJAY KUMAR Signature Not Verified