SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 37550

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vinod Yadav & 3 Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State Of M.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Vivek Singh,R.Verma,N.Vyas,R.Singh,R.Chouhan/,Ag.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH th ON THE 18 OF MARCH, 2024 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 565 of 2008 BETWEEN:-

1. VINOD YADAV S/O RAMMANOHAR YADAV, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS GURUKUL COLONY, RAU, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. PAWAN KUMAR S/O BADALDAS YADAV, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETD. GURUKUL COLONY, RAU, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. BHARAT S/O BADALDAS YADAV, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETD. GURUKUL COLONY, RAU, INDORE (DELETED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 07-1-14)

4. SANTOSH S/O BHARAT YADAV, AGED ABOUT 32 YEAR S , OCCUPATION: SERVICE GURUKUL COLONY, RAU, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....APPELLANTS (NONE FORT HE APPELLANTS)

AND STATE OF M.P. THROUGH PS. RAJENDRA NAGAR, DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENT ( BY SHRI MAYANK MISHRA - PANEL LAWYER)

This appeal coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

This appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by the judgment dated 07.04.2008 passed by the Signature Not Verified learned IX Additional Sessions Judge, Indore in S.T.No.466/2005. By the impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted the appellants/acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top