SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 38496

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rajendra Jain – Appellant
Versus
Ms. R.R. Home Developers Pvt. Ltd. Through Director Shri Yash Gupta – Respondent
CR 420/2022



Advocates:
Vishal Baheti,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH th ON THE 10 OF APRIL, 2024 CIVIL REVISION No. 420 of 2022 BETWEEN:-

RAJENDRA JAIN S/O SHRI PUKHRAJ JAIN, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS 20 JANKI NAGAR MAIN INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER (SHRI VISHAL BAHETI, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER) .

AND

1. MS. R.R. HOME DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

THROUGH DIRECTOR SHRI YASH GUPTA S/O SHRI RAJESH GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, 108 SAJAN NAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. HEERALAL GARI S/O BABULALJI GARI (CHOUDHARY) VILLAGE DUDHIYA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. KAILASH GARI S/O BABULALJI GARI (CHOUDHARY) VILLAGE DUDHIYA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

4. JAGDISH GARI S/O BABULALJI GARI (CHOUDHARY) VILLAGE DUDHIYA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

5. JANKILAL GARI S/O BABULALJI GARI (CHOUDHARY) VILLAGE DUDHIYA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

6. MAHENDRA GARI S/O BABULALJI GARI (CHOUDHARY) VILLAGE DUDHIYA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

7. CHHITTAR GARI S/O SHRI AMARJI GARI VILLAGE DUDHIYA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT INDORE. (MADHYA PRADESH)

Signature Not Verified Signed by: HARIKUMAR

8. OM PRAKASH GARI S/O RAMKARAN GARI VILLAGE DUDHIYA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

9. RAMNARAYAN GARI S/O SHRI RAMKARAN GARI VILLAGE DUDHIYA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

10. RAMKARAN GARI S/O RAMRATAN GARI VILLAGE DUDHIYA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

11. MAHESH GARI S/O RAMRATAN GARI VILLAGE DUDHIYA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

12. SMT. PARVATI BAI W/O RAMKARAN GARI VILLAGE DUDHIYA TEHSIL AND DISTRICT INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

13. PS ESTATE THROUGH ITS PARTNER SHRI AKSHAY CHOPRA S/O SURESH CHOPRA 20 JANKI NAGAR INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

14. MANOJ WAREHOUSING AND LOGISTICS PVT.

LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI MANOJ JAIN S/O SHRI CHANDRA KUMAR JAIN 401, KRISHNA PRINCESS CASTOLE 127 JAWRA COMPOUND OPP LIOUS DEN INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

15. SMT. ARCHANA W/O SHRI RAJESH KUMAR JINDAL 3 SHRADDA NAND MARG CHHAWANI CHOUK MAIN ROAD INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

16. SHRI RAJESH KUMAR JINDAL S/O LATE SHRI MUNNALALJI JINDAL 3 SHRADDA NAND MARG CHHAWANI CHOUK MAIN ROAD INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

17. SHRI SURESH CHAND AGRAWAL S/O SHRI BABULAL AGRAWAL 145, JAWRA COMPOUND INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

18. SARITA AGRAWAL W/O SHRI DHEERAJ AGRAWAL 145 JAWRA COMPOUND INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

19. SMT. NIKKI AGRAWAL W/O SHRI NEERAJ Signature Not Verified Signed by: HARIKUMAR AGRAWAL 145 JAWRA COMPOUND INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

20. TUSHAR CHOPRA DECEASED THR LRS SMT.

BHUMIKA W/O SHRI TUSHAR CHOPRA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE 74 JANKI NAGAR INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

21. TUSHAR CHOPRA DECEASED THR LRS REHAN CHOPRA THR GUARDIAN SMT. BHUMIKA W/O SHRI TUSHAR CHOPRA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE 74 JANKI NAGAR INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

22. TUSHAR CHOPRA DECEASED THR LRS DHAIRYA CHOPRA THR GUARDIAN SMT. BHUMIKA W/O SHRI TUSHAR CHOPRA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE 74 JANKI NAGAR INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

23. RAJKUMAR S/O SHRI GAJENDRA KOCHAR 203 CHANDRAMANI APARTMENT 3/A JANKI NAGAR INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

24. COLLECTOR / DISTRICT MAGISTRATE 145 JAWRA COMPOUND INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (SHRI ATUL KUMAR GUPTA, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT [R-1].

This revision coming on for orders this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the suit has been dismissed by the trial court in default, therefore, this petition has rendered infructous. He further submits that counsel for the respondent has also filed an application before the trial court for restoration of the suit In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. In case the suit is restored back, the petitioner is at liberty to revive this petition.

Signature Not Verified Signed by: HARIKUMAR (HIRDESH)

JUDGE hk/

Signature Not Verified Signed by: HARIKUMAR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top