SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 38866

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sunil Gupta – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sanjiv Kumar Mishra,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA th ON THE 18 OF APRIL, 2024 CRIMINAL REVISION No. 2096 of 2022 BETWEEN:-

SUNIL GUPTA S/O SHRI BABULAL GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS R/O- VILLAGE GAOAL PATTI, DHERE BENGOW, P.S. HADAPSAR, DISTRICT PUNE, (MAHARASHTRA)

.....PETITIONER (BY SHRI SANJIV KUMAR MISHRA - ADVOCATE)

AND

1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH P. S.

SOHAGI DISTRICT REWA, (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. VICTIM A D/O NOT KNOWN NOT MENTION (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (SHRI ADITYA NARAYAN GUPTA - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1)

This revision coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

This criminal revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C.

has been filed being aggrieved by the order dated 28.04.2022 passed by the Special Judge (The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences, 2012) wherein charges for offences punishable under Section363, 366 and 376(2)(n) of Indian Penal Code and Section 5 (l)/6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the complainant made written report on Signature Not Verified Signed by: ANINDYA

23.11.2021 at Police Station Soha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top