2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 38981
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Kishun & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Rammnohar & Ors. – Respondent
FA 211/2005
Vibudhendra,Ravendra,Janendra,Amaresh Mishra,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH nd ON THE 22 OF APRIL, 2024 FIRST APPEAL No. 211 of 2005 BETWEEN:-
1. KISHUN, AGED 75 YEARS, SON OF RAMDHAN SAHU, 2. SITARAM, AGED 50 YEARS.SON OF GANESH SAHU, 3. RAM PRATAP, AGED 35 YEARS, SON OF GANESH SAHU, 4. MST. MUNIA, AGED 75 YEARS, WIDOW OF GANESH SAHU, ALL-RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAJMILAN, POST OFFICE RAJMILAN, POLICE STATION MADA. TAHSIL SINGRAULI, DISTRICT SIDHI (M.P.)
.....APPELLANTS (BY NONE)
AND
1. RAM MANOHAR, AGED 59 YEARS, SON OF BUDHALAL SAHU
2. MST. RAIMAT, AGED 77 YEARS, WIDOW OF LATE BUDHLAL SAHU
3. SHOKLAL, 80 years, son of Ram Bharos Sahu, 4. ABHAYLAL, AGED 69 YEARS, SON OF RAM BHAROS SAHU, 5. RADHIKA PRASAD, AGED 67 YEARS, SON OF RAM BHAROS SAHU, ALL-RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAJMILAN, POST OFFICE RAJMILAN. POLICE STATION MADA, TAHSIL SINGRAULI, DISTRICT SIDHI (M.P.)
6. MST. JAITUNIA, AGED 72 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF RAM BHAROS SAHU, WIFE OF SARJU PRASAD, 7. JITLAL, AGED 65 YEARS, SON OF RAM RATAN SAHU, Signature Not Verified
8. SHESHLAL, AGED 61 YEARS. SON OF RAM RATAN SAHU, 9. LAKHPATI, AGED 58 YEARS, SON OF RAM RATAN SAHU, 10. RAM KUMAR, AGED 50 YEARS, SON OF RAM RATAN SAHU, 6 TO10- ALL-RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAJMILAN, POST OFFICE RAJMILAN, POLICE STATION MADA, TAHSIL SINGRAULI, DISTRICT SIDHI (M.P.)
11. MST. DROPATI, AGED 57 YEARS.DAUGHTER OF LATE BUDHALAL SAHU, WIFE OF DEOSHARAN SAHU, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SUHIRA. TAHSIL SINGRAULI, DISTRICT SIDHI (M.P.)
12. SHYAMLAL, AGED 65 YEARS, SON OF CHHOTAKAN, SHAH, 13. SHANKHALAL, AGED 70 YEARS, SON OF TILAK SAHU, 14. HIRALAL, AGED 66 YEARS, SON OF TILAK SAHU
15. LAKHANDHARI, AGED 62 YEARS, SON OF TILAK SAHU, 16. ISHWAR DAYAL, AGED 50 YEARS, SON OF MODI SAHU
17. GANGA, AGED 65 YEARS, SON OF RAMU SAHU, 18. LAHURAMAN, AGED 62 YEARS, SON OF RAMU SAHU
19. CHAITLAL, AGED 70 YEARS, SON OF JAGADHARI
20. MALIK, AGED 42 YEARS, SON OF PANCHADHARI SAHU.
21. UDAICHAND, AGED 40 YEARS, SON OF PANCHADHARI SAHU
22. BANWARILAL, AGED 70 YEARS, SON OF SUMESHWAR SAHU, 23. MST. SAHODARI, AGED 75 YEARS, WIDOW OF GOVIND SAHU, 12 TO 23 ALL-RESIDENT OF VILLAGE RAJMILAN, POST OFFICE RAJMILAN, POLICE STATION MADA. TAHSIL SINGRAULI,DISTRICT SIDHI (M.P.)
24. KUNTI, AGED 45 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF GOVIND. WIFE OF RAMLAL. RESIDENT OF VILLAGE SUHIRA, TAHSIL SINGRAULI, DISTRICT SIDHI
25. JAGMANTI, AGED 50 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF GOVIND. WIFE OF TULA PRASAD, Signature Not Verified
26. SHIVDHAN, AGED 60 YEARS, SON OF JAIMANGAL SAHU.
27. DEONARAYAN, AGED 65 YEARS, SON OF JAIMANGAL SAHU.
28. VISHUN, AGED 70 YEARS, SON OF RAMDHAN SAHU, 29. RAMAUTAR, SINCE DECEASED, NOW BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES -
A. MST GAURA DEVI, AGED 50 YEARS, WIDOW OF RAMAUTAR, B. ASHISH KUMAR, AGED 32 YEARS, SON OF RAMAUTAR SAHU, C. SHYAM SUNDAR, AGED 30 YEARS, SON OF LATE RAMAUTAR SAHU, D. ARCHANA, AGED 28 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE RAMAUTAR SAHU, E. CHANDRAKALA, AGED 26 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE RAMAUTAR SAHU, F. URMILA, AGED 23 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE RAMAUTAR SAHU, 29 (A,B,C,D,E,F) ALL-RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PAJAREH TAHSIL SINGRAULI, DISTRICT SIDHI (M.P.)
.....RESPONDENTS (BY NONE)
This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:
ORDER
On 14.06.2016, earlier learned counsel Shri Vibhudhendra Mishra had pleaded no instructions on behalf of the appellants and S.P.C. was issued.
Thereafter, no new Vakalatnama by any counsel has been filed and no party appeared as per the order-sheet, therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want for prosecution.
Let the information be sent to the concerned Court.
Signature Not Verified (AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH)
JUDGE VSG Signature Not Verified