SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 39958

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Mukesh And Anr. – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Manoj Saxena,A.G.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH th ON THE 9 OF MAY, 2024 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 208 of 2013 BETWEEN:-

1. MUKESH AND ANR. S/O KAMAL SINGH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST GRAM AALNIYA P..S. KALAPIPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. OMPRAKASH S/O HINDUSINGH , AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST GRAM AALNIYA P.S. KALAPIPAL DIST. SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....APPELLANTS (NONE FOR THE APPELLANTS )

AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH P.S. AJK, SHAJAPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENT (BY SHRI MAYANK MISHRA - PANEL LAWYER )

This appeal coming on for hearing this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

This appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved by the judgment dated 28.01.2013 passed by the learned Special Judge (Atrocities), District Shajapur in S.S.T.No.53/2010. By the impugned judgment, the trial Court has convicted the appellant no.1-Mukesh for offence under Section 334 of IPC and sentenced to three counts (one month R.I each count) and appellant no.2- Omprakash for the offence under Signature Not Verified Section 334/34 of IPC and sentenced to three counts (One month R.I.each c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top