SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 41283

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Chaturbhuj Vishwakarma – Appellant
Versus
Gram Panchayat Ghoogsi – Respondent


Advocates:
Madan Singh,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DEVNARAYAN MISHRA th ON THE 10 OF MAY, 2024 SECOND APPEAL No. 3493 of 2019 BETWEEN:-

CHATURBHUJ VISHWAKARMA S/O BADLI VISHWAKARMA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, OCCUPATION: FARMER R/O VILLAGE GHOOGSI, TAHSIL NIWADI, DISTRICT TIKAMGARH, M.P.

(MADHYA PRADESH)

.....APPELLANT (BY SHRI S.S. THAKUR - ADVOCATE FOR APPELLANT)

AND

1. GRAM PANCHAYAT GHOOGSI THROUGH SECRETARY GRAM PANCHAYAT GHOOGSI TAHSIL NIWADI, DISTRICT TIKAMGARH, M.P.

(MADHYA PRADESH)

2. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR. COLLECTOR DISTT-TIKAMGARH (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI RAMJI PATEL - PANEL LAWYER FOR STATE)

This appeal coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

Heard.

2. Learned counsel for appellant has submitted that the suit was filed on the ground that sanction to construct the road in Government land Survey No.645 admeasuring 0.640 hectare was granted but by constructing a road on that land the agricultural land of Village Sarpanch Sona Devi was being affected, hence, instead of constructing the road on that land encroaching upon the Signature Not Verified Signed by: DHEERAJ plaintiff's land Survey No.844, the road is bei

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top