SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2797

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AVANINDRA KUMAR SINGH, J
Padam Itroriya – Appellant
Versus
Rahul Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Sachin Jain,

ORDER

This case was heard and reserved for orders on 25.02.2025.

2. This Misc. appeal under order 43 Rule 1 ® of CPC has been filed by the appellants/defendants against the order dated 08.10.2024, passed in Civil Suit No. RCS 105A/2024, (Rahul Jain Vs. Padam and others) by 6th District Judge, Damoh.

3. It is submitted that suit was filed for specific performance of contract regarding alleged agreement dated 31.07.2023. The suit property is situated in Village Laadanbagh, Tehsil and District- Damoh. The application under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 of CPC filed by the plaintiff was allowed. It is also submitted that the agreement dated 31.07.2023 is an unregistered document and changes were made in the agreement without prior taking consent of the appellant, therefore, it was void. The agreement was for six months but balance amount was not paid, therefore, no relief should have been granted on the basis of said document. Therefore, when time is an essence of the contract and payment was not made, then no relief should have been granted. Even otherwise, plaintiff fails to fix show readiness and willingness.

4. Notice was issued to the respondent/plaintiff but they did not appear, inspite of se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top