SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 41744

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Seema Nayak – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Smt.Lalita Gupta,S.K.Gupta,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE th ON THE 10 OF JULY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 4466 of 2011 SMT. SEEMA NAYAK AND OTHERS Versus SUNIL JAIN AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Santosh Agarwal - Advocate for the petitioner.

None ORDER The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is preferred against the order dated 07.01.2010 passed in MJC No.10/2009 by IInd Civil Judge Class-I Ashoknagar, whereby an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC along with application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for setting aside an ex parte judgment and decree dated 27.04.2004, was rejected. The petitioner is further aggrieved by order dated 25.02.2011 passed in M.A No.15/2010 passed by Ist Additional District Judge, Ashoknagar, whereby the appeal preferred against the order dated 07.01.2010 dismissing the application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, was dismissed and the order dated 07.01.2010 was affirmed.

2. Short facts of the case are that the present respondent no.1 had filed suit for recovery of money. In the suit it was averred that predecessor of the petitioner Gopal and Jagjit Singh arrayed as defendant no.1 and 2/plaintif

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top