SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 41912

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Mohammad Rafiq Jindran – Appellant
Versus
Ashik Jindran – Respondent


Advocates:
Himansh Nigam,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA th ON THE 18 OF JULY, 2024 MISC. PETITION No. 4122 of 2023 MOHAMMAD RAFIQ JINDRAN Versus ASHIK JINDRAN Appearance:

Shri Rakesh Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri ORDER Per: Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari Heard on the question of admission and interim relief.

The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails the order dated 01.09.2022 passed in Case No. 04/02020 by the trial Court by which the right of petitioner/defendant to file written statement has been closed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that, the plaintiff/respondent herein has filed a civil suit under Order 7 Rule 1 of CPC r/W Section 134 of Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Section 62 of Copy Right Act, 1957 for declaration and permanent injunction. The present petitioner was contesting as defendant before the learned trial Court. Plaintiff/respondent herein has filed an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC and has also filed application Signature Not Verified under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment in the plaint which was a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top