SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 42253

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Jagdish Shukla – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Santosh Agrawal,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR VANI ON July 29, 2024 WRIT APPEAL No. 699 of 2024 JAGDISH SHUKLA AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Santosh Agrawal provided counsel for the appellants.

Shri Vivek Khedkar, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents No. 1 and 2/State.

Shri Prashant Sharma, learned counsel for respondents No. 3 to 12.

ORDER Per: Justice Vivek Rusia Appellants/petitioners have filed this appeal under Section 2 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyay Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, challenging the order dt. 31.10.2023 passed in Writ Petition No. 25215/2021, whereby the Writ Court dismissed the Writ Petition and upheld the order dt.03.11.2021 (Annexure P/1) passed by the Additional Commissioner, Chambal Division, Morena (Madhya Pradesh), thereby allowing the appeal and setting aside the order dt.02.01.2020 (Annexure P/2) passed by the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Sab Division Sabalgarh, District Morena.

Signature Not Verified Signed by: SANJEEV

2. Facts of the case, in short, are as follows:

(i) The appellants/peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top