Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA, J
Shivam Tripathi – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
The present petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs :
(i) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus to Respondents No.2 and 3 to amend the Final Answer Key dated 19.07.2024, No.714/69/2011/P-9 [Annexure P/1] of Preliminary Examination Madhya Pradesh State Service and State Forest Service Examination, 2024 with respect to following questions in Set A including in their answers the options provided hereunder and make similar consequential changes in other sets.
| QUESTIONS | ADD AS ANSWER THE FOLLOWING OPTION(S) |
11. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India declare the prevalence of Fundamental Rights over Directive Principles of the State Policy in case of conflict between the two? (A) Golaknath vs State of Punjab (1967) (B) State of Madras vs Champakam Dorairajan (1951) (C) Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala (1973) (D) Minerva Mills vs Union of India (1980) | (A) Golaknath vs State of Punjab (1967) (D) Minerva Mills vs Union of India (1980) |
27. Birha is the popular folk song of which group of tribal women ? (A) Gond (B) Kol (C) Bhil (D) Sahariya | (B) Kol |
| 42. A …………. attack comes in the form of deceptive emails or text messages that may ask y |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
