SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 42813

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Amit @ Raju – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Vikesh Pratap Singh,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI &

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE ANURADHA SHUKLA th ON THE 7 OF NOVEMBER, 2024 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2269 of 2011 AMIT @ RAJU Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Sandesh Dixit - Advocate for the appellant.

Ms. Shweta Yadav - Deputy Advocate General for the State.

JUDGMENT Per: Justice Smt. Anuradha Shukla Challenging the judgment of conviction and sentence delivered by Additional Sessions Judge, Jabalpur, in Sessions Trial No.278/2011 on 30.8.2011, this appeal has been preferred. Under the impugned judgment, appellant along with another person named Shakir, son of Gulfam, was convicted of the offence of Section 307 read with Section 34 of IPC and was sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.1,000/- with a default clause to undergo additional imprisonment of three months in case of non-payment of fine.

2. It is relevant to mention here that the other convict Shakir, son of Gulfam, had preferred a separate criminal appeal as Criminal Appeal No.2482/2011 which was dismissed as withdrawn on 20.12.2022.

3. Brief facts relevant for the decision of this case are that complainant Sig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top