SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 43197

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ankit Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Hariom Bansal – Respondent


Advocates:
Padam Singh,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA th ON THE 25 OF NOVEMBER, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 42868 of 2024 ANKIT AGRAWAL Versus HARIOM BANSAL AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Padam Singh and Shri Nikhil Shivhare, Advocates for the applicant.

Shri Rajesh Kumar Shukla, Advocate for respondent no.1.

Shri Ajay Kumar Nirankari, Public Prosecutor for respondent no.2/State.

ORDER This first application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C/482 of B.N.S.S. has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail.

2. The applicant apprehends his arrest by Police Station Kotwali, District Gwalior in connection with Complaint Case No.3879/2024 for offences under Sections 420, 409/34 and 120B of IPC.

3. According to the complaint, complainant happens to be the proprietor of Hari Om Enterprises. He had purchased sugar from M/s DCM Shriram Limited, Sugar Unit Roopapur. The accused persons, in connivance with each other, have caused financial loss to the complainant. Complainant had agreed to purchase 300 gunny bags of sugar for a consideration amount of Rs.9,92,565/-, out of which 145 quintals of sugar was supplied by the applicant, and the remaining 155 quintals of sugar wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top