SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 43347

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rahul Jatav – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Manish Sharma,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA th ON THE 29 OF NOVEMBER, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 50417 of 2024 RAHUL JATAV AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Manish Sharma - Advocate for applicants.

Smt. Anjali Gyanani - Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State.

ORDER This application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashment of F.I.R. in Crime No.0196/2023 registered at Police Station Thatipur, District Gwalior for offence under Sections 294, 323, 506, 34 of IPC and under Section 354 of IPC as well as RCT No.4129/2023 pending in the Court of JMFC, Gwalior.

2. It is submitted by counsel for applicant that against the F.I.R. lodged by complainant in Crime No.196//2023, he had made an application for free and fair investigation and, accordingly, the Superintendent of Police directed the CSP, Morar, District Gwalior to conduct an inquiry who by his report dated 25.07.2023 opined that no offence was committed.

3 . Accordingly, counsel for applicant was directed to address on the question as to whether a parallel inquiry during pendency of investigation is permissible or not and whether

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top