SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 43425

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Jitendrasingh – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Himanshu Thakur,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA rd ON THE 3 OF DECEMBER, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 51553 of 2024 JITENDRASINGH Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Himanshu Thakur - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Monisha Kasturi - P.L. for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. This petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Section 428 of the BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 11/9/2024 passed by the Special Judge, NDPS Act, Jawad, District Neemuch whereby his application filed under Section 91 and 92 of the Cr.P.C read with Section 65-B of the Evidence Act to preserve the call details and tower location of the mobile phone and CCTV footage of the places as mentioned in the application has been rejected.

2. In the present case the petitioner is facing trial in Sessions Trial No.SC/ST 50/24 for the offences punishable under Section 8/15, 25, 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985 registered at police station Jawad, District Neemuch.

3. In the aforesaid case the petitioner's defence is that he has been falsely implicated in the case and was not present on the spot when he was apprehended. He was picked up from the house and was taken to the polic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top