SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 43491

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Neena – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Gajendra S. Thakur,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S. BHATTI ON THE 4th OF DECEMBER, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 45701 of 2022 SMT. NEENA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Ashish Shrivastava - Senior Advocate through Video Conferencing along with Shri Gajendra S. Thakur - Advocate for the applicant.

Shri R.P. Prajapati - Panel Lawyer for the State.

Shri Siddharth Sharma - Counsel for respondent No.2/Department of Income-

Tax.

ORDER This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed for setting aside the impugned orders dated 30/01/2020 (Annexure P/1) passed in MJCR No.101/2019 passed by the Court of Special Railway Magistrate, Khandwa and also order dated 13/09/2022 (Annexure A/3) passed by the Court of I Additional Sessions Judge, Khandwa, District Khandwa.

2. The facts as elaborated in the memorandum of petition reveal that one Mehul Patel lodged a report on 26/03/2019 with Government Railway Police Thana, Khandwa, submitting that he was a resident of Ahmedabad and was working with the company named and styled as M/s Mectec. The said company is owned by Smt. Neena Signature Not Verified Kamlesh Shah which was being

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top