SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 43630

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Arvind Parashar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sunil Kumar Mishra,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE ANURADHA SHUKLA th ON THE 10 OF DECEMBER, 2024 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 34555 of 2024 ARVIND PARASHAR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra - Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Shanti Tiwari - Panel Lawyer for the State-respondent no.1.

Reserved on: 14.11.2024 Pronounced on: 10.12.2024 ORDER This petition under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) has been filed for seeking quashment of FIR and all consequential proceedings registered against petitioner in context of Crime No.361/2023 of Police Station, Road Pipariya, district Narmadapuram, for the offence of Sections

420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC.

2. Brief facts relevant for the decision of this petition are that Supal Singh, son of Fakkad Singh, resident of village Dob, Tahsil Babai, district Narmadapuram, challenged the sale-deed of property of Survey No.3, 6/3, 6/4, 6/5, having area respectively 1.586, 0.113, 0.405 and 0.910 hectares; according to him, this property was of his ownership and was never sold by him; he further claimed that a wr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top