SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 18323

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Gautam And Ors. – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Jagat Sher Singh, Ks.Singh,Ak.Dubey/,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR (VERMA)

nd ON THE 2 OF MARCH, 2023 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 2850 of 2000 BETWEEN:-

1. GAUTAM S/O PYARELAL DHIMAR, AGED ABOUT

35 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DEPARTMENT OF WEIGHTS & MEASURES, R/O RETATEK BARGI DAM REHABILITATION FISHERY COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, TIKARIYA, DISTRICT-MANDLA (M.P.)

2. ANUP SINGH S/O PYARELAL DHIMAR, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, CASTE DHIMAR, OCCUPATION LABROURER, R/O VILLAGE PADMI, P.S.

TIKARIYA DISTRICT-MANDLA (M.P.)

3. MUKESH KUMAR S/O PYARELAL BURMAN, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, CASTE DHIMAR, OCCUPATION LABOURER R/O TIKARIYA, DISTRICT-MANDLA (M.P.)

.....APPELLANT (BY SHRI SHIVAM SINGH - ADVOCATE )

AND THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENT (BY SHRI DINESH PATEL - PANEL LAWYER FOR THE RESPONDENT/STATE )

This appeal coming on for final hearing this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

This criminal appeal is preferred under section 374 (2) of Cr.P.C. by Signature Not Verified SAN the appellant being aggrieved by the judgment dated 29.11.2000 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Atrocities, Mandla in Special Sessions Case No.134/2000, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top