ORDER

Having regard to the similitude in the controversy involved in all these petitions heard analogously learned counsels for the parties assailing impugned order dated 23/08/2023 in Sessions Trial No.535of 2021 (Police Station Kanadiya Vs. Ashok Jain) and this common order will govern all these petitions.

2. By impugned order the application of Accused Ashok Jain (Revisionist in CRR 444 of 2024) has been partially allowed, discharging him qua section 465, 467, 468, 471, 201, 406 of IPC, but declined to discharge for offence under Section 420 IPC, which is triable by Magistrate, and hence transferred the case to the Magistrate Court. State and the Complainant-Rajeev Agnihotri have filed CRR 925 of 2024 and CRR no 5422 of 2023 respectively, against discharge, and the Accused-Ashok Jain has filed CRR 444 of 2024 against declining discharge for offence under Section 420 IPC. (For the sake of brevity, parties have been referred hereinafter as Complainant, Accused and State/ Prosecution.) All three parties (Accused, Complainant and the State) have filed the respective revision petitions.

3. Facts necessary for disposa