SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 19302

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Swapnil Ghate – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
RP 405/2023



Advocates:
Chandra Sen Roman,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE nd ON THE 2 OF MAY, 2023 REVIEW PETITION No. 405 of 2023 BETWEEN:-

1. SWAPNIL GHATE S/O LATE SHRI RAGHUNATHRAO GHATE, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, CE 410 DEENDAYAL NAGAR, GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. UDAY KULKARNI S/O LATE SHRI BASANT KURKARNI OCCUPATION: JOB NEW TELEPHONE EXCHANGE BUYPASS ROAD MADHUBAN COLONY SHEOPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. VINOD KUMAR JEMANI S/O LATE SHRI MANGILAL JEMANI, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, HOUSE NO 60 CHAMBAL COLONY SHEOPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

4. YOGENDRA KUMAR SHARMA S/O LATE SHRI HUBLAL SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 33 SURESH NAGAR GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....PETITIONER (BY SHRI C.R. ROMAN - ADVOCATE)

AND

1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

2. PRAMUKH ABHIYANTA JAL SANSADHAN VIBHAG, VALLABH BHAVAN, BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

3. VI./YAN. BHARI MACHINARY, SAMBHAG, JAL SANSADHAN VIBHAG, GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH)

4. KARYAPALAN YANTARI JAL SANSADHAN Signature Not Verified V I B H A G THATIPUR SHEOPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

.....RESPONDENTS (SHRI VIVEK KHEDKAR - ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR STATE )

This petition coming on for admission this day, the court passed the following:

ORDER

The present review petition has been filed by the petitioners on the ground that inadvertently in the cause title, the address of respondent No.2 in place of "Pramukh Abhiyanta Jal Sansadhan Vibhag, Vallabh Bhavan, Bhopal, "Pramukh Abhiyanta Jal Sansadhan Vibhag, Thatipur Gwalior" has been mentioned and so far as address of respondent No.3 is concerned, in place of "Vi./Yan. Bhari Machinary Sambhag, Jal Sansadhan Vibhag, Gwalior," "Karyapalan Yantri Jal Sansadhan Vibhag Thatipur, Gwalior has been mentioned. Therefore, it is prayed that in the penultimate paragraph of the order dated 11.04.2023 wherein it has been directed that the respondent authorities shall decide the representation in place of which the name of specific authorities may kindly be mentioned.

Prayer so made by counsel for the petitioners appears to be reasonable.

Accordingly, it is directed that in place of "Pramukh Abhiyanta Jal Sansadhan Vibhag, Thatipur Gwalior" it may be read as "Pramukh Abhiyanta Jal Sansadhan Vibhag, Vallabh Bhavan, Bhopal" and in place of "Karyapalan Yantri Jal Sansadhan Vibhag Thatipur, Gwalior" it may be read as "Vi./Yan. Bhari Machinary Sambhag, Jal Sansadhan Vibhag, Gwalior"

respectively.

In consequence thereof, let order dated 11.04.2023 passed in Writ Signature Not Verified Petition No.8012 of 2023 is directed to be corrected to the extent that the representation would be decided by respondents No.2 and 3, namely, Pramukh Abhiyanta Jal Sansadhan Vibhag, Vallabh Bhavan, Bhopal and Vi./Yan. Bhari Machinary Sambhag, Jal Sansadhan Vibhag, Gwalior.

This order shall be read conjointly with the order dated 11.04.2023 to the extent above.

Review Petition is disposed of finally in above terms.

Let a copy of this order be kept in record of Writ Petition No.8012 of

2023.

(MILIND RAMESH PHADKE)

JUDGE pwn*

Signature Not Verified

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top