HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Abdul Hamid Khan – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Kumar – Respondent
MCC 125/2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA th ON THE 8 OF MAY, 2023 MISC. CIVIL CASE No. 125 of 2020 BETWEEN:-
ABDUL HAMID KHAN S/O LATE ABDUL RASHID KHAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION: ADVOCATE AND AGRICULTURIST, R/O: 18-A NALIYA BAKHAL, UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....APPLICANT (NONE FOR THE APPLICANT)
AND
1. RAJENDRA KUMAR S/O MADHAVRAO CHITNIS, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS, R/O: 16 NALIYA BAKHAL, UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
2. ADITYA KUMAR S/O MADHAVRAO CHITNESS, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS, R/O: 16, NALIYA BAKHAL, UJJAIN DIST UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
3. SMT. RAMARANI D/O MADHAVRAO CHITNESS, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWORK, R/O: 16, NALIYA BAKHAL, UJJAIN DIST UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
4. SMT. MRIDULARANI D/O MADHAVRAO CHITNESS, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWORK, R/O: 16, NALIYA BAKHAL, UJJAIN DIST UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
5. SMT. CHANDRAKALA W/O SHIVNARAYAN KUMAWAT, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWORK 205, PATEL NAGAR, UJJAIN DIST UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
6. DECD. CHOGALAL S POONA BA BAJAY TH. LR'S ARUN SISODIYA S/O LATE CHOGALALJI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS GRAM Signature Not Verified Signed by: SHILPA CHINTAMAN JABASIYA, TEHSIL AND DIST UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
7. ISHVARLAL S/O POONA BA, AGED ABOUT 38 YE A R S , OCCUPATION: BUSINESS GRAM CHINTAMAN JABASIYA, TEHSIL AND DIST UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
8. SUGANBAI URF BALVANTA BAI D/O POONA BA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWORK GRAM DEVAR, TEHSIL AND DIST DEWAS (MADHYA PRADESH)
9. STATE OF M.P THROUGH COLLECTOR, STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH, DIST UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
10. FIRM SHRIRAM INVESTMENT UJJAIN TH.
PARTNER SANJAY S/O SANTOSH KASLIWAL, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS HOUSE NO. 172, SETHI NAGAR, UJJAIN (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS This application coming on for order this day, the court passed the following:
ORDER
None for the applicant.
Record perused.
This application has been filed for restoration of M.P. No.4368/2018 which stands dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 18.12.2019.
02. For the reasons stated in the application the same is allowed and M.P.
No.4368/2018 dismissed for want of prosecution by order dated 18.12.2019 is restored to its original number for hearing on merits subject to payment of costs of Rs.3,000/- by the applicant in the library fund of M.P. High Court Bar Association, Indore.
03. Let a copy of this order be kept in the record of M.P. No.4368/2018.
Signature Not Verified Signed by: SHILPA
04. This M.C.C. is accordingly allowed and disposed off.
(PRANAY VERMA)
JUDGE Shilpa Signature Not Verified Signed by: SHILPA
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.